首页> 外文OA文献 >Borders, Fences, and Limits—Protecting Austria From Refugees:Metadiscursive Negotiation of Meaning in the Current Refugee Crisis
【2h】

Borders, Fences, and Limits—Protecting Austria From Refugees:Metadiscursive Negotiation of Meaning in the Current Refugee Crisis

机译:边界,栅栏和界限-保护奥地利免受难民侵害:当前难民危机中意义的元递归谈判

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The so-called refugee crisis presents a field of discursive struggle over meanings in politics. In Austria, mediatized politics in 2015 and 2016 was dominated by metadiscursive negotiation of terminology related to building a border fence and setting a maximum limit on refugees. Both issues raised serious ideological and legal concerns and were thus largely euphemized; as responses to ever-increasing pressure from the political right, however, they were also intended as signals to voters. This article presents a discourse-historical study of the normalization of restrictive policies in the theoretical framework of border and body politics, otherness, and mediatization.
机译:所谓的难民危机提出了一个就政治意义进行辩论的领域。在奥地利,2015年和2016年的媒介化政治主要是与建立边界围栏和对难民设置最大限制有关的术语的元数据谈判。这两个问题都引起了严重的意识形态和法律关注,因此在很大程度上受到了谴责;作为对政治权利不断增加的压力的回应,然而,它们也旨在向选民发出信号。本文以话语历史为基础,对边界和身体政治,其他性和中介化的理论框架中的限制性政策的规范化进行了研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号